<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for bioneural.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioneural.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioneural.net</link>
	<description>bioneural.net is for stuff worth sharing: commentary by Bruce McKenzie. Major topics covered are gadgets, informatics, Internet, Mac, mobile, musings, New Zealand, photography, Project Koru, quicklinks, rant, rave, travel and Windows</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac geotagging software showdown by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F05%2F05%2Fmac-geotagging-software-showdown%2F%23comment-76677&amp;seed_title=Mac+geotagging+software+showdown#comment-76677</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=948#comment-76677</guid>
		<description>[quote post="948"]In which mode you can do this?[/quote]

See &lt;a href="http://www.bioneural.net/2008/04/08/evaluating-the-holux-m-241-data-logger/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; Rudolf, or p.15 in the User Guide (not well explained); in Mode 3 a little flag symbol will briefly flash on-screen to indicate a waypoint has been recorded. You can actually be recording a track log at the same time, then change to Mode 3 and record waypoints as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F05%2F05%2Fmac-geotagging-software-showdown%2F%23comment-76677&amp;seed_title=Mac+geotagging+software+showdown#comment-"><p>
In which mode you can do this?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>See <a href="http://www.bioneural.net/2008/04/08/evaluating-the-holux-m-241-data-logger/" rel="nofollow">here</a> Rudolf, or p.15 in the User Guide (not well explained); in Mode 3 a little flag symbol will briefly flash on-screen to indicate a waypoint has been recorded. You can actually be recording a track log at the same time, then change to Mode 3 and record waypoints as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac geotagging software showdown by Rudolf</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F05%2F05%2Fmac-geotagging-software-showdown%2F%23comment-76676&amp;seed_title=Mac+geotagging+software+showdown#comment-76676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=948#comment-76676</guid>
		<description>"The Holux M-241 like many loggers has the ability to record waypoints. Instead of automatically recording thousands of track points—few of which are associated with a photo—you manually push a button to "mark" a location, and later load a list of time-stamped waypoints to which you match the EXIF time-stamp in each photo"

In which mode you can do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Holux M-241 like many loggers has the ability to record waypoints. Instead of automatically recording thousands of track points—few of which are associated with a photo—you manually push a button to "mark" a location, and later load a list of time-stamped waypoints to which you match the EXIF time-stamp in each photo"</p>
<p>In which mode you can do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Skype and Mac-friendly alternative to iSight by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Fa-skype-and-mac-friendly-alternative-to-isight%2F%23comment-76675&amp;seed_title=A+Skype+and+Mac-friendly+alternative+to+iSight#comment-76675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2007/04/18/a-skype-and-mac-friendly-alternative-to-isight/#comment-76675</guid>
		<description>Will: on webcams, most zooming is just software blowing up the pixels bigger.. no new information is added to the picture fyi.. still shots (along with some sweet effects and even "green screening" backdrops) are great in photo booth in your applications folder... or if not, get it from someone else's application folder lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will: on webcams, most zooming is just software blowing up the pixels bigger.. no new information is added to the picture fyi.. still shots (along with some sweet effects and even "green screening" backdrops) are great in photo booth in your applications folder... or if not, get it from someone else's application folder lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating the Holux M-241 data logger by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F04%2F08%2Fevaluating-the-holux-m-241-data-logger%2F%23comment-76674&amp;seed_title=Evaluating+the+Holux+M-241+data+logger#comment-76674</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=912#comment-76674</guid>
		<description>Another battery update. I took out the Engerizer in my Holux: it had Jul 1998 written on the side. Opps! So in went a brand new Engerizer Ultimate ("Use by 2013"); I turned on the logger and left it to die:

First time stamp: 9 May 2008 11:34:14
Last time stamp: 10 May 2008 01:00:50

That's 9841 track points consuming 7% of available storage, covering approx. 13.5h and costing &#163;1.25 (not including environmental damage!). That's more like it.

I can only assume my lightly-used Uniross 2100mAh rechargeables are either rubbish, or that they too deteriorate after a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another battery update. I took out the Engerizer in my Holux: it had Jul 1998 written on the side. Opps! So in went a brand new Engerizer Ultimate ("Use by 2013"); I turned on the logger and left it to die:</p>
<p>First time stamp: 9 May 2008 11:34:14<br />
Last time stamp: 10 May 2008 01:00:50</p>
<p>That's 9841 track points consuming 7% of available storage, covering approx. 13.5h and costing &pound;1.25 (not including environmental damage!). That's more like it.</p>
<p>I can only assume my lightly-used Uniross 2100mAh rechargeables are either rubbish, or that they too deteriorate after a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bose know customer service by Ronald Heft</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F04%2F22%2Fbose-know-customer-service%2F%23comment-76673&amp;seed_title=Bose+know+customer+service#comment-76673</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Heft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=926#comment-76673</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with you, Bose is great in customer service. I recently picked up a pair of QC2s after being impressed with my Dad's QC3s. While I personally haven't had any experience with customer service, everywhere I go I hear kind words about their support. I feel relived knowing that should something ever go wrong with my headphones, support shouldn't be difficult to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with you, Bose is great in customer service. I recently picked up a pair of QC2s after being impressed with my Dad's QC3s. While I personally haven't had any experience with customer service, everywhere I go I hear kind words about their support. I feel relived knowing that should something ever go wrong with my headphones, support shouldn't be difficult to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unarranged overdraft bank charges by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F05%2F08%2Funarranged-overdraft-bank-charges%2F%23comment-76672&amp;seed_title=Unarranged+overdraft+bank+charges#comment-76672</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=950#comment-76672</guid>
		<description>@Oh Waily: Yes, it is a good thing that they paid the cheque&#8212;they acknowledged it was a "small sum" (indicating they wouldn't have paid if it were a large amount, but I don't know their cutoff.) If they can see the overdraft was relatively trivial, you'd think they might reflect that in the fees. If my cheque added 3 zeros I'd still have been charged the same.

Incidentally I hadn't written a cheque for ages. Had the National Insurance Office not received my Class 1 contributions, I would have re-directed some of my frustration at them. I wanted to make an electronic payment but for instructions you have to phone them; their phone only tells you they're too busy so try again later. After several attempts I followed "how to pay by cheque" on the invoice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Oh Waily: Yes, it is a good thing that they paid the cheque&mdash;they acknowledged it was a "small sum" (indicating they wouldn't have paid if it were a large amount, but I don't know their cutoff.) If they can see the overdraft was relatively trivial, you'd think they might reflect that in the fees. If my cheque added 3 zeros I'd still have been charged the same.</p>
<p>Incidentally I hadn't written a cheque for ages. Had the National Insurance Office not received my Class 1 contributions, I would have re-directed some of my frustration at them. I wanted to make an electronic payment but for instructions you have to phone them; their phone only tells you they're too busy so try again later. After several attempts I followed "how to pay by cheque" on the invoice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unarranged overdraft bank charges by Oh Waily</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F05%2F08%2Funarranged-overdraft-bank-charges%2F%23comment-76671&amp;seed_title=Unarranged+overdraft+bank+charges#comment-76671</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh Waily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=950#comment-76671</guid>
		<description>Interesting attitude to customer service.  Presumably it is an automated function.  

I imagine that a bank here would simply bounce the cheque and you would be charged the fee for that.  
Your creditor would then be slightly peeved, and either be mean enough to continue representing the cheque (generating more bounce fees) or would attempt to contact you about the problem.   

I also vaguely remember a bank here advertising to the effect of - if you accidentally go into overdraft, but have funds in other accounts, they would either use the other accounts to cover the cheque or at very least only charge you the unarranged OD interest rate on the outstanding balance since you clearly had funds available but had erred.

It is always nice to deal with a sympathetic person.  It's a shame that so much of banking satisfaction appears to be dependent upon your relationship with your manager or someone who is not the "more than my job's worth" rigid-rule-following type.  I can definitively say that my view of my banks past and current is based on the competence and people skills of my regular contact person.  What a difference it makes when I feel my banker is my friend.

Good on you for standing up to unnecessarily punitive fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting attitude to customer service.  Presumably it is an automated function.  </p>
<p>I imagine that a bank here would simply bounce the cheque and you would be charged the fee for that.<br />
Your creditor would then be slightly peeved, and either be mean enough to continue representing the cheque (generating more bounce fees) or would attempt to contact you about the problem.   </p>
<p>I also vaguely remember a bank here advertising to the effect of - if you accidentally go into overdraft, but have funds in other accounts, they would either use the other accounts to cover the cheque or at very least only charge you the unarranged OD interest rate on the outstanding balance since you clearly had funds available but had erred.</p>
<p>It is always nice to deal with a sympathetic person.  It's a shame that so much of banking satisfaction appears to be dependent upon your relationship with your manager or someone who is not the "more than my job's worth" rigid-rule-following type.  I can definitively say that my view of my banks past and current is based on the competence and people skills of my regular contact person.  What a difference it makes when I feel my banker is my friend.</p>
<p>Good on you for standing up to unnecessarily punitive fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac geotagging software showdown by BOK</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F05%2F05%2Fmac-geotagging-software-showdown%2F%23comment-76669&amp;seed_title=Mac+geotagging+software+showdown#comment-76669</link>
		<dc:creator>BOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=948#comment-76669</guid>
		<description>@Bruce: thanks! That makes me reconsider my choice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bruce: thanks! That makes me reconsider my choice...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating the Holux M-241 data logger by icerabbit</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F04%2F08%2Fevaluating-the-holux-m-241-data-logger%2F%23comment-76668&amp;seed_title=Evaluating+the+Holux+M-241+data+logger#comment-76668</link>
		<dc:creator>icerabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=912#comment-76668</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Bruce.

It sounds like it might be a combination of batteries and a power hungry Holux. 

I am not confident any more that the Energizer and other A brand rechargeable are as great / last as long as they used to be / to do. Plus the lack of memory effect doesn't help with storage necessarily. 

I've got some 1 year old Li-ION bricks for pro tools that you're supposed to store charged and keep cool (basement, closet) when not in use for a prolonged time and I just took them out of storage (4 months) and their indicator lights were flashing empty (0/4). So much for holding power. At least these have a lifetime replacement warranty. 

Last year I sent a batch of Energizer 2500 mAh back under warranty. They had been marked (permanent marker colored rim per set of 4 (helps to keep track of batteries and separate out different mAh types)) used for a couple months exclusively on a digital camera with mild use, where the camera was used a couple of times a week for a few shots. Charged exclusively with their charger without leaving them plugged in for days at a time. The things wouldn't hold a charge for days without using them. Charge during the week. Pick up the camera on the weekend and a x number of shots later the camera is out of juice. 

The other thing we have noticed along that, we think, is that the AA 1500 - 1850 range held up for more months that the newer 2100 and certainly the 2500 series do. We've used the older kind extensively with cameras and anything that uses AA batteries on car trips, and the batteries certainly seemed to hold a good charge for probably a hundred charge cycles and thus lasted several years. Now, the newer new 2000+ ones start flashing in the charger = kaput after a couple dozen cycles. 

Of course one can argue that different cameras have different power needs, the chargers changed from whole day to 8 - 4 - 1 - 1/2 hours. We're happiest with the 2100 mAh and 1 hour and 1/2 hour chargers. Which are no longer available :)

Anyway. Didn't hear back any details on that from Energizer (not that I expected it). They were going to analyze my  batteries in the lab and gave me two discount coupons for new batteries. 

I'm still using the new 2500s with our 'old' 1/2 hour charger that came with 2100s. I'm thinking the 'new' charger was to blame. Or just a fluke where they forgot to put the right mix in a batch of batteries. Who knows ? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Bruce.</p>
<p>It sounds like it might be a combination of batteries and a power hungry Holux. </p>
<p>I am not confident any more that the Energizer and other A brand rechargeable are as great / last as long as they used to be / to do. Plus the lack of memory effect doesn't help with storage necessarily. </p>
<p>I've got some 1 year old Li-ION bricks for pro tools that you're supposed to store charged and keep cool (basement, closet) when not in use for a prolonged time and I just took them out of storage (4 months) and their indicator lights were flashing empty (0/4). So much for holding power. At least these have a lifetime replacement warranty. </p>
<p>Last year I sent a batch of Energizer 2500 mAh back under warranty. They had been marked (permanent marker colored rim per set of 4 (helps to keep track of batteries and separate out different mAh types)) used for a couple months exclusively on a digital camera with mild use, where the camera was used a couple of times a week for a few shots. Charged exclusively with their charger without leaving them plugged in for days at a time. The things wouldn't hold a charge for days without using them. Charge during the week. Pick up the camera on the weekend and a x number of shots later the camera is out of juice. </p>
<p>The other thing we have noticed along that, we think, is that the AA 1500 - 1850 range held up for more months that the newer 2100 and certainly the 2500 series do. We've used the older kind extensively with cameras and anything that uses AA batteries on car trips, and the batteries certainly seemed to hold a good charge for probably a hundred charge cycles and thus lasted several years. Now, the newer new 2000+ ones start flashing in the charger = kaput after a couple dozen cycles. </p>
<p>Of course one can argue that different cameras have different power needs, the chargers changed from whole day to 8 - 4 - 1 - 1/2 hours. We're happiest with the 2100 mAh and 1 hour and 1/2 hour chargers. Which are no longer available :)</p>
<p>Anyway. Didn't hear back any details on that from Energizer (not that I expected it). They were going to analyze my  batteries in the lab and gave me two discount coupons for new batteries. </p>
<p>I'm still using the new 2500s with our 'old' 1/2 hour charger that came with 2100s. I'm thinking the 'new' charger was to blame. Or just a fluke where they forgot to put the right mix in a batch of batteries. Who knows ? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating the Holux M-241 data logger by David</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2008%2F04%2F08%2Fevaluating-the-holux-m-241-data-logger%2F%23comment-76667&amp;seed_title=Evaluating+the+Holux+M-241+data+logger#comment-76667</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/?p=912#comment-76667</guid>
		<description>hmm.. methinks I shall await an iPhone integrated solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.. methinks I shall await an iPhone integrated solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.106 seconds -->
