bioneural.net site preferences

Accessibility

Toggle width/ text size:

style

Default/Alternate

Suits visual impairment, mobile devices

Styling

Change the theme:

layout

NB: may reduce functionality

Link behaviour

Links with an icon are off-site:

links

Right-click any link to optionally open in a new window or tab


Software for Universal backups

I have very little PowerPC-complied software left on my Intel-based Mac now. Although Appple's Rosetta technology works extremely well, ditching non-Universal apps is not unlike a therapeutic cleansing of sorts. I was anxious to do the same when transitioning from Mac OS 9 to "native" OS X binaries. But SilverKeeper, my long-standing favourite freeware backup app, is compiled for PPC only—and there's no sign of a Universal Binary in the foreseeable future. Should I live with this, or find an alternative?

Silverkeeper is for keeps

I regularly backup the User directories from two computers to a single external hard drive. When we bought a LaCie d2 for this purpose some years ago it came with a utility called Silverkeeper. I've periodically tried other apps (including Apple's own Backup), but kept returning to SilverKeeper because it did everything I wanted with the minimum of fuss. It will:

  • Remember the settings from the previous backup, so it knows which files and folders to backup and which to exclude, sending them to the same destination;
  • Update the destination with only those files that have changed, modifying, copying, or deleting as necessary to ensure the destination reflects the source in the minimum possible timeframe;
  • Restore an individual file simply by copying it from the destination back to the source.

That's it—all I need it to do. I don't need scheduled backups since I use a reminder in iCal to prompt me when a backup is due (as I must retrieve the drive from the safe and connect it up; "no hands" automation is thus impossible). Nor do I need it to keep multiple backup versions, as I don't have the drive space (which isn't as cheap as some folk make out). SilverKeeper can however do these things too. It's compact, stable, reliable, and has a nice personality. What more could I want? Well, it's naive about Intel CPUs...

Silverkeeper

I wrote to LaCie and asked if a Universal Binary was on the cards. They said (20.12.06, quoted with permission):

No immediate plans. This is because SilverKeeper is I/O bound, and gains little by adding Universal support. In fact, it grows in size, considerably, with no benefit to the user.

Fair enough. But what about that cleansing itch?

Disqualified

Retrospect is the granddaddy of Mac backup applications, but is not Universal.

Apple Backup depends on the weak subscription-only .Mac service. Although this rules it out for me, the app is easy to use and importantly will save time by updating only those files which have changed.

Universal choice

Universal options include the following products, some requiring a purchased license or suggested donation. Features variably include simple copying, incremental backup, versioning, exclusions, scheduling, encryption, archive compression, backup to drive/ removal media/ online server—in varying degrees of transparency.

SuperDuper

The most attractive option to me was SuperDuper. As we backup two computers to the same external drive, we don't have the drive space to make the recommended full/ bootable ("all files") backup; the non-bootable "user files" option is more realistic. Custom copy scripts (e.g. Documents + User Library, or a script that ignores your voluminous iTunes Library) are not available in the unregistered version.

Derek points out that PowerPC-based Macs [may] need to boot off a Firewire drive, while Intel-based Macs can readily boot from a USB drive as well.

Scripts

Smart Update copies (or deletes) files and folders as necessary to match the source, taking less time than erasing and copying everything from scratch. Again, this copy mode costs a ~$US30 registration fee, although the unregistered version will completely erase the existing backup and make a time-consuming copy of all files to the source.

Smart

Heed the warning: "If you have stored a file on the destination volume that you want to keep, but isn’t present on the source, it will be removed. In general, we strongly recommend that you store a backup on its own volume or partition, on a FireWire or internal drive that supports booting the Macintosh." But you can backup more than one Mac to the same destination if you use sparse images rather than a volume or single partition (see below).

Schedule backups are supported if you need this (I have a repeating event in iCal to remind me). To recover a file you accidentally deleted, it's a simple matter to mount the external drive, mount the disk image, and drill down you directory structure to locate the required file. The backup image is typically a "sparse" type, meaning it grows to accommodate the size of your source files.

Sparse

The future

Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) promises to deliver a Time Machine. If that software doesn't live up to the hype, it's good to know SuperDuper is standing by as an Intel-friendly replacement for SilverKeeper. SuperDuper is reported to be least likely to cause problems with metadata loss, although the "partially recommended" SilverKeeper has never let me down.

9 responses to “Software for Universal backups”


  1. 1 Kevin S.

    LaCie saying it is unlikely they will release a universal version of SilverKeeper doesn't necessarily mean they won't release an Intel version. They could take the (in my opinion shortsighted) Adobe route and develop an Intel only version. I imagine they would want to see Time Machine out in the wild before they decide whether or not it would be worth spending the resources required to do this properly though.

    Anyway, I'm with you on SilverKeeper. I've used Backup, Carbon Copy Cloner and SilverKeeper and really prefer SilverKeeper the most. Because I don't normally run as admin, Carbon Copy Cloner keeps asking me for my admin password when I backup my entire drive. I think this is because it is authenticating with sudo so every time it needs to copy a new system directory and if five minutes or so has elapsed since the last time I authenticated I'm required to authenticate again. A workaround is to just switch to my admin account, but I'm lazy. Backup was fine, but I am no longer a .Mac subscriber so it is now limited to backups of a few hundred measly MB. SilverKeeper just asks me to authenticate once from my non-admin account and then does what it's supposed to. I'm still running a G4 though, so I have no need to cleanse myself of non-universal binaries just yet.

  2. 2 Completely Confused

    Bruce, I use ChronoSync from Econ Technologies - I'm very happy with it. P.S. - Belated Happy Birthday.

  3. 3 Rob

    Some more great research here, Bruce.

    I bought Impression a while back but haven't had much luck with it. Granted, I haven't really used it until recently (finally got an external drive for backups). It will encrypt and compress the backups, but it took absolutely forever and errored out at the very end.

    So, I'm kind of in backup limbo right now. I'll have to look at your recommendations.

  4. 4 davus

    Actually, on the silverkeeper website it states that "SilverKeeper is compatible with PowerPC as well as Intel processors running OS X."
    Now I don't have an Intel Mac so I couldn't try.

  5. 5 Bruce

    That's right Davus; a "universal" app is one that contains both PowerPC and Intel code.

  6. 6 Adonis

    Have you considered iBackup? It has two things going for it...it's universal and free. I've used an older version (5.1.4) with only a minor issue or two, but now a newer version (5.2.1) is available.

  7. 7 Bruce

    Have you considered iBackup? It has two things going for it...it's universal and free.

    I did (it's listed above under Universal Choice) and I agree: it has two things going for it.

  8. 8 Rob

    Some more thoughts...

    • How's SilverKeeper working under 10.4.9? Bruce, I guess you can't answer because you're on an Intel Mac (it doesn't run Intel, right?)
    • PsyncX is pretty limited from my first impression.
    • Thanks for the iBackup link. This looks to be a very nice program. I like the plugin architecture. That sure makes for quick backup ideas!
    • Have you guys heard of Mozy? Looks very much like the Apple Backup but free!
  9. 9 Bruce

    SilverKeeper runs fine under Rosetta Rob. However, for some months now I've been using SuperDuper, which I registered to benefit from the Smart Update feature. It makes a reliable backup (which I've had to use), athough seems to need a lot of free space to create the sparse image and will not always mount it without help (perhaps because my disk image is around 60GB).

    Mozy looks useful in so far as 1GB free online storage could come in handy, but has more limited appeal if you have 2 whole User directories to backup as I do. I think this would be great for backing up, say, a current project, or select data such as your Address Book contacts and iCal files. It's good to see they have a Mac OS client which, as you mention, is very like Apple's Backup in use.

Something to say?

Comments may be moderated (e.g. no commercial promotion), are subject to spam filtering, and should be relevant to this post—otherwise make contact.

Usable tags include <a href=""> <blockquote> <em>. Select any text and click to quote.