<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xtra requires extra patience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioneural.net/2006/12/20/xtra-requires-extra-patience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F12%2F20%2Fxtra-requires-extra-patience%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Xtra+requires+extra+patience</link>
	<description>bioneural.net is for stuff worth sharing: commentary by Bruce McKenzie. Major topics covered are gadgets, informatics, Internet, Mac, mobile, musings, New Zealand, photography, Project Koru, quicklinks, rant, rave, travel and Windows</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F12%2F20%2Fxtra-requires-extra-patience%2F%23comment-26663&amp;seed_title=Xtra+requires+extra+patience#comment-26663</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/12/20/xtra-requires-extra-patience/#comment-26663</guid>
		<description>Cable was our next choice after Woosh, but Telstra's highly-informed sales staff weren't initially sure if we could get it or not (each time I rang I got a different answer). It turns out our street &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; cabled, but installation would have involved drilling through our landlord's walls&#8212;not something we were keen on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable was our next choice after Woosh, but Telstra's highly-informed sales staff weren't initially sure if we could get it or not (each time I rang I got a different answer). It turns out our street <em>is</em> cabled, but installation would have involved drilling through our landlord's walls&mdash;not something we were keen on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohwailywaily</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F12%2F20%2Fxtra-requires-extra-patience%2F%23comment-26629&amp;seed_title=Xtra+requires+extra+patience#comment-26629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohwailywaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/12/20/xtra-requires-extra-patience/#comment-26629</guid>
		<description>The joy of service from the incumbent monopoly!

We only use Telecom for our home phone line, every other telecommunications option at home and work we have deliberately chosen another provider.  This stems from a month of not having our new lines installed in our new work building, despite having placed the request some two months before our moving in date.  What did they do?  Set up a redirect to the mobile phone, pay the extra charges and then at the end of it all offered us [sarcasm on] a whopping [sarcasm off] one month rebate off of our line rental costs.

Unsurprisingly we have never looked at them again after that debacle, price bribery included.

At home we use Ihug for broadband and I can't really complain too much about the speed.  We're on one of the old plans, so haven't expected the 7 Mb speeds they say are possible.  But since there isn't really any great cost difference I might change over in the new year.

At work we use Telstra for broadband and on the whole it has been fine.  There was a bumpy bit a while back, which our IT guy suggested was Telecom stuffing around at the exchange in an attempt to meet the broadband capacity required by users.

Your comment: "I think Telecom/Xtra have a major problem with network capacity; there just isn't enough broadband to go around." is quite correct !!

You are beautifully placed to take advantage of the cable network in Wellington.  Was there a specific reason you chose to go with Xtra rather than cable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The joy of service from the incumbent monopoly!</p>
<p>We only use Telecom for our home phone line, every other telecommunications option at home and work we have deliberately chosen another provider.  This stems from a month of not having our new lines installed in our new work building, despite having placed the request some two months before our moving in date.  What did they do?  Set up a redirect to the mobile phone, pay the extra charges and then at the end of it all offered us [sarcasm on] a whopping [sarcasm off] one month rebate off of our line rental costs.</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly we have never looked at them again after that debacle, price bribery included.</p>
<p>At home we use Ihug for broadband and I can't really complain too much about the speed.  We're on one of the old plans, so haven't expected the 7 Mb speeds they say are possible.  But since there isn't really any great cost difference I might change over in the new year.</p>
<p>At work we use Telstra for broadband and on the whole it has been fine.  There was a bumpy bit a while back, which our IT guy suggested was Telecom stuffing around at the exchange in an attempt to meet the broadband capacity required by users.</p>
<p>Your comment: "I think Telecom/Xtra have a major problem with network capacity; there just isn't enough broadband to go around." is quite correct !!</p>
<p>You are beautifully placed to take advantage of the cable network in Wellington.  Was there a specific reason you chose to go with Xtra rather than cable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
