<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IOTW: Bad light, good photo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioneural.net/2006/10/09/iotw-bad-light-good-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F10%2F09%2Fiotw-bad-light-good-photo%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=IOTW%3A+Bad+light%2C+good+photo</link>
	<description>bioneural.net is for stuff worth sharing: commentary by Bruce McKenzie. Major topics covered are gadgets, informatics, Internet, Mac, mobile, musings, New Zealand, photography, Project Koru, quicklinks, rant, rave, travel and Windows</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F10%2F09%2Fiotw-bad-light-good-photo%2F%23comment-8436&amp;seed_title=IOTW%3A+Bad+light%2C+good+photo#comment-8436</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/10/09/iotw-bad-light-good-photo/#comment-8436</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phil. It's a Nikon D70 with the 18-70mm kit lens. Last week in Hong Kong I managed to find the AF-S DX VR Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED, which seems impossible to obtain in Europe (or from B&#038;H Photo in New York). The VR = vibration reduction and, according to Nikon:

&lt;blockquote cite="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0511/05110103nikon18-200vr.asp"&gt;...enables significantly sharper handheld images at slower shutter speeds and in a wider range of lighting conditions than previous models. Equipped with the new lens, users can take pictures at shutter speeds up to four times slower than is possible with a non-VR lens.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I've yet to put this to the test, but my hope is that it will lengthen the window of usable available light, so that shots like the above work by design rather than accident!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phil. It's a Nikon D70 with the 18-70mm kit lens. Last week in Hong Kong I managed to find the AF-S DX VR Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED, which seems impossible to obtain in Europe (or from B&#038;H Photo in New York). The VR = vibration reduction and, according to Nikon:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F10%2F09%2Fiotw-bad-light-good-photo%2F%23comment-8436&amp;seed_title=IOTW%3A+Bad+light%2C+good+photo#comment-"><p>...enables significantly sharper handheld images at slower shutter speeds and in a wider range of lighting conditions than previous models. Equipped with the new lens, users can take pictures at shutter speeds up to four times slower than is possible with a non-VR lens.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I've yet to put this to the test, but my hope is that it will lengthen the window of usable available light, so that shots like the above work by design rather than accident!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Renaud</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F10%2F09%2Fiotw-bad-light-good-photo%2F%23comment-8413&amp;seed_title=IOTW%3A+Bad+light%2C+good+photo#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Renaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/10/09/iotw-bad-light-good-photo/#comment-8413</guid>
		<description>ooooh
that is a *very* nice shot, especially considering the lowlight. What kind of camera are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooooh<br />
that is a *very* nice shot, especially considering the lowlight. What kind of camera are you using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
