<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airport vs. Ethernet: wireless at the cost of speed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F</link>
	<description>bioneural.net is for stuff worth sharing: commentary by Bruce McKenzie. Major topics covered are gadgets, informatics, Internet, Mac, mobile, musings, New Zealand, photography, Project Koru, quicklinks, rant, rave, travel and Windows</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1907&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 06:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>threegs, sorry your comment got caught in my spam filter, although I can't see why. But spam filters are just like WEP&#8212;necessary to keep away evil people just waiting to attack. They (the Evil ones) are working with the aliens; it's all a conspiracy. Paranoid? Huh! Hang on, what's with that white van outside the house? Was that a knock on my door?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>threegs, sorry your comment got caught in my spam filter, although I can't see why. But spam filters are just like WEP&mdash;necessary to keep away evil people just waiting to attack. They (the Evil ones) are working with the aliens; it's all a conspiracy. Paranoid? Huh! Hang on, what's with that white van outside the house? Was that a knock on my door?...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokermac</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1838&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>pokermac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>I agree - with that amount of protection, only aliens could get in.

Damn those alien sniffers and MAC spoofers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - with that amount of protection, only aliens could get in.</p>
<p>Damn those alien sniffers and MAC spoofers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threegs</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1834&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>threegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Try turning off the encryption. I did (with a similar setup) and it seemed to make a difference, however, this is not a great long term solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try turning off the encryption. I did (with a similar setup) and it seemed to make a difference, however, this is not a great long term solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1799&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>Theft didn't occur to me. If this were the explanation then my neighbours are much cleverer than I thought! I don't broadcast my SSID, I do use WEP encryption, and I restrict access to hand-picked MAC addresses only. Short of turning it off, I beleive this is as secure as I can make my WiFi router (it doesn't do WPA). I suppose all this security would be childs play to crack for the aliens anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theft didn't occur to me. If this were the explanation then my neighbours are much cleverer than I thought! I don't broadcast my SSID, I do use WEP encryption, and I restrict access to hand-picked MAC addresses only. Short of turning it off, I beleive this is as secure as I can make my WiFi router (it doesn't do WPA). I suppose all this security would be childs play to crack for the aliens anyway...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokermac</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1797&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>pokermac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 06:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>Bandwidth theft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bandwidth theft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1754&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>Yes Bouzy I do have a cordless phone, operating in the 1880 to 1900 MHz range. But I'm not sure that's the issue. I did some more testing tonight and don't know what to make of the results (down/upstream speeds):

Mac mini Ethernet: 866/242 Kbps
Mac mini Airport: 874/232 Kbps
MacBook Ethernet: 865/242 Kbps
MacBook Airport: 865/239 Kbps

No appreciable different between connection method or machine!

So no, I don't think you would get better results using Ethernet cf. Airport. I still can't explain what (was?) affecting my Airport connection&#8212;perhaps the Mothership is no longer in orbit overhead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Bouzy I do have a cordless phone, operating in the 1880 to 1900 MHz range. But I'm not sure that's the issue. I did some more testing tonight and don't know what to make of the results (down/upstream speeds):</p>
<p>Mac mini Ethernet: 866/242 Kbps<br />
Mac mini Airport: 874/232 Kbps<br />
MacBook Ethernet: 865/242 Kbps<br />
MacBook Airport: 865/239 Kbps</p>
<p>No appreciable different between connection method or machine!</p>
<p>So no, I don't think you would get better results using Ethernet cf. Airport. I still can't explain what (was?) affecting my Airport connection&mdash;perhaps the Mothership is no longer in orbit overhead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouzy Rouge</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1748&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>Bouzy Rouge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>Do you have cordless phone? I have heard that they will interfers if not 5.8MHz.

I am getting download of about 54KBps max when using airporot   iBook.

I am never using ehternet with internet. Do you think ethernet would deliver faster speeds on 512/128 ADSL plan than 802.11 wireless would?

I tried ethernet once and it was basically the same speed as with wireless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have cordless phone? I have heard that they will interfers if not 5.8MHz.</p>
<p>I am getting download of about 54KBps max when using airporot   iBook.</p>
<p>I am never using ehternet with internet. Do you think ethernet would deliver faster speeds on 512/128 ADSL plan than 802.11 wireless would?</p>
<p>I tried ethernet once and it was basically the same speed as with wireless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1557&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>OK, so that's 2 votes for the aliens, 0 votes for crap technology. &lt;em&gt;The Truth is Out There.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so that's 2 votes for the aliens, 0 votes for crap technology. <em>The Truth is Out There.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2Fairport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed%2F%23comment-1554&amp;seed_title=Airport+vs.+Ethernet%3A+wireless+at+the+cost+of+speed%3F#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2006/06/21/airport-vs-ethernet-wireless-at-the-cost-of-speed/#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>I say it's the aliens.  ;)

I get really strange intermittent connection with my DSL, Qwest.  Power cycling my wireless router usually fixes it, but what a pain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say it's the aliens.  ;)</p>
<p>I get really strange intermittent connection with my DSL, Qwest.  Power cycling my wireless router usually fixes it, but what a pain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
