<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A prosumer digicam or a dSLR?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioneural.net/2005/10/17/a-prosumer-digicam-or-a-dslr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2005%2F10%2F17%2Fa-prosumer-digicam-or-a-dslr%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=A+prosumer+digicam+or+a+dSLR%3F</link>
	<description>bioneural.net is for stuff worth sharing: commentary by Bruce McKenzie. Major topics covered are gadgets, informatics, Internet, Mac, mobile, musings, New Zealand, photography, Project Koru, quicklinks, rant, rave, travel and Windows</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2005%2F10%2F17%2Fa-prosumer-digicam-or-a-dslr%2F%23comment-158&amp;seed_title=A+prosumer+digicam+or+a+dSLR%3F#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2005/10/17/a-prosumer-digicam-or-a-dslr/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Good comments and I certainly often wish my 10D with 24-70L lens was easier to wield for casual shots. Maybe better quality cameras in phones are going to take over the bottom of the digital camera market.

BTW the original article is from &lt;a href="http://ilikecameras.com"&gt;I Like Cameras&lt;/a&gt;. Digital Photography Blog were the kind folk who linked to my ILC article and Engadget picked up on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments and I certainly often wish my 10D with 24-70L lens was easier to wield for casual shots. Maybe better quality cameras in phones are going to take over the bottom of the digital camera market.</p>
<p>BTW the original article is from <a href="http://ilikecameras.com">I Like Cameras</a>. Digital Photography Blog were the kind folk who linked to my ILC article and Engadget picked up on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
