bioneural.net site preferences

Accessibility

Toggle width/ text size:

style

Default/Alternate

Suits visual impairment, mobile devices

Styling

Change the theme:

layout

NB: may reduce functionality

Link behaviour

Links with an icon are off-site:

links

Right-click any link to optionally open in a new window or tab


Dirty pictures

I don't usually post dirty pictures, but I'm going to make an exception...

The following image (in addition to demonstrating noise) shows a number of dirt particles representing several of the world's deserts—mostly the Namib. I'm sorry if you were expecting some other kind of dirty ;-)

How do I know this? A while back I sent my camera, a Sony DSC-F717, in for a service. It needed some kind of in-warranty focus adjustment to the holographic AF laser which meant it had to be cracked open. At the time I got a call from Sony Service who were very surprised to have a fine red powder spill onto the workbench when the camera was opened. Now I didn't delivery bury it inthe oxidised Namibian sand—but there was a lot carried by the wind.

f717dust

The Man at Sony said "You might as well buy a new camera" since the cost of cleaning all the sand out of the body and lens would be prohibitive (a Sony trait I later discovered).

As a result I've been unable to do without the Healing Brush in Photoshop 7, or more recently Photoshop Elements 3.0 for Mac. It's only really a problem in areas of sky (but I do shoot mainly landscapes.) Although there are a lot of things I like about the F717 (and it was the best prosumer camera I could afford at the time) this is one more problem to add to the list of "issues" I have with my ageing Sony:

  • Image noise;
  • No RAW ability (so JPEG compression artefacts, and TIFF takes way too long to save and too much memory e.g. 15 MB);
  • The electronic viewfinder is crap. I realised this by comparison with a D70 shooting a waterfall into the sun;
  • Almost every picture needs significant levels adjustment;
  • By the time I've attached my wide 0.7x wide converter, gone to the set-up menu, turned the converter setting to on, gone back to the Program setting, and composed the shot - the moment has passed;
  • My 1.7x tele-converter is bulky and weighs significantly more than my SLR long lens;
  • It's a Sony; Sony are in my bad books.

I guess I need a new camera. A D70 is on order...

Update: A D70 can produce dirty pictures too! See here to witness the diference a CCD clean can make.

0 responses to Dirty pictures


  1. No comments

Something to say?

Comments may be moderated (e.g. no commercial promotion), are subject to spam filtering, and should be relevant to this post—otherwise make contact.

Usable tags include <a href=""> <blockquote> <em>. Select any text and click to quote.