<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buy... I mean bye, Sony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioneural.net/2005/03/18/buy-i-mean-bye-sony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2005%2F03%2F18%2Fbuy-i-mean-bye-sony%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Buy...+I+mean+bye%2C+Sony</link>
	<description>bioneural.net is for stuff worth sharing: commentary by Bruce McKenzie. Major topics covered are gadgets, informatics, Internet, Mac, mobile, musings, New Zealand, photography, Project Koru, quicklinks, rant, rave, travel and Windows</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2005%2F03%2F18%2Fbuy-i-mean-bye-sony%2F%23comment-75551&amp;seed_title=Buy...+I+mean+bye%2C+Sony#comment-75551</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2005/03/18/buy-i-mean-bye-sony-rant/#comment-75551</guid>
		<description>Claire, I'm surprised you think that &#163;176 &lt;em&gt;minimum&lt;/em&gt; from Sony vs. the &#163;40 I paid to get my valued tape back is "reasonable". I'd call it robbery.

Furthermore, forcing third parties to order an entire tape cage at &#163;300 rather than just the part at fault, is divisive.

I'm pleased to read that you have confidence in Sony products and services. Unfortunately the experience of my extended family has been different. It's a competitive marketplace and no doubt difficult for any manufacturer to distinguish themselves in terms of product quality or aftersales support.

This old post was a rant, so its purpose was to let of steam. Disclosure: we since bought another Sony camcorder&#8212;a sign perhaps that I have "mov[ed] in tho the real world" as you put it. We bought a discontinued low-end model that we can toss when it stops working, knowing Sony's diagnostic fee equates to replacement cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claire, I'm surprised you think that &pound;176 <em>minimum</em> from Sony vs. the &pound;40 I paid to get my valued tape back is "reasonable". I'd call it robbery.</p>
<p>Furthermore, forcing third parties to order an entire tape cage at &pound;300 rather than just the part at fault, is divisive.</p>
<p>I'm pleased to read that you have confidence in Sony products and services. Unfortunately the experience of my extended family has been different. It's a competitive marketplace and no doubt difficult for any manufacturer to distinguish themselves in terms of product quality or aftersales support.</p>
<p>This old post was a rant, so its purpose was to let of steam. Disclosure: we since bought another Sony camcorder&mdash;a sign perhaps that I have "mov[ed] in tho the real world" as you put it. We bought a discontinued low-end model that we can toss when it stops working, knowing Sony's diagnostic fee equates to replacement cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Sumners</title>
		<link>http://www.bioneural.net/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bioneural.net%2F2005%2F03%2F18%2Fbuy-i-mean-bye-sony%2F%23comment-75550&amp;seed_title=Buy...+I+mean+bye%2C+Sony#comment-75550</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire Sumners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioneural.net/2005/03/18/buy-i-mean-bye-sony-rant/#comment-75550</guid>
		<description>If you take the time to read the Sony repair forms, it is clear that £176 does cover all repairs.  The only exceptions are physical damage, sand/liquid ingress.  In these cases, if the £176 threshold is exceeded, an estimate is issued.  Obviously, raising an estimate involves stripping the unit, so is labour intensive, so there has to be a fee involved.
 
To me, this seems absolutely reasonable.  Check out repair fees for other manufacturers.  You'll see that Sony are one of the cheapest.

We all know that with a highly complex machine like a camcorder, any repair is extremely skilled and labour intensive and hence has a cost that has to reflect the work required.

I managed to drop my Sony DCRTRV30 camcorder.  It was clearly badly damaged.  I sent it off to Sony Central Service and thought that I could sent the estimate to my insurance company.  They managed to do the repair for the fixed cost, so I was over the moon.

I really think you need to move in to the real world and accept that the price of camcorders has become so cheap, but labour costs are high.  That's just the way it is I'm afraid.  I for one am sticking with Sony. They have the best customer service of any manufacturer that I've experienced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you take the time to read the Sony repair forms, it is clear that £176 does cover all repairs.  The only exceptions are physical damage, sand/liquid ingress.  In these cases, if the £176 threshold is exceeded, an estimate is issued.  Obviously, raising an estimate involves stripping the unit, so is labour intensive, so there has to be a fee involved.</p>
<p>To me, this seems absolutely reasonable.  Check out repair fees for other manufacturers.  You'll see that Sony are one of the cheapest.</p>
<p>We all know that with a highly complex machine like a camcorder, any repair is extremely skilled and labour intensive and hence has a cost that has to reflect the work required.</p>
<p>I managed to drop my Sony DCRTRV30 camcorder.  It was clearly badly damaged.  I sent it off to Sony Central Service and thought that I could sent the estimate to my insurance company.  They managed to do the repair for the fixed cost, so I was over the moon.</p>
<p>I really think you need to move in to the real world and accept that the price of camcorders has become so cheap, but labour costs are high.  That's just the way it is I'm afraid.  I for one am sticking with Sony. They have the best customer service of any manufacturer that I've experienced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
